Building cross-cultural competency through evidence.
Colorblindness is the belief that the best way to create fairness is to ignore race and treat everyone the same. While often rooted in positive intentions, this approach can make it difficult to recognize how race continues to shape experiences, opportunities, and outcomes. Explore our resources to build practical skills for identifying and interrupting colorblind thinking in everyday conversations, decisions and systems.
Deficit thinking is the belief that differences in achievement, opportunity, or outcomes are primarily caused by perceived shortcomings within individuals, families, or communities. Historically, deficit thinking has often attributed these disparities to assumed cultural, behavioral, intellectual, or even genetic deficiencies within certain groups, rather than examining the broader social, historical, and institutional factors that shape outcomes. By focusing on what people are presumed to lack, deficit thinking can obscure strengths, assets, and systemic barriers. Explore our resources to learn how to recognize deficit thinking and adopt more asset-based, equity-focused approaches.
Poverty disciplining is the belief that poverty and its associated challenges result primarily from the behaviors, attitudes, or values of low-income individuals and families. Rather than examining systemic factors that shape economic opportunity, this perspective focuses on changing how people think and behave. In schools and other institutions, poverty disciplining can appear in policies and practices that regulate, monitor, or attempt to "fix" individuals experiencing poverty. Explore our resources to learn how to recognize poverty disciplining and develop more equitable, dignity-centered approaches to supporting individuals and communities.